UK Visa Refusal Risk Check – Self-Assessment Tool
This self-assessment tool covers key refusal risk factors UKVI decision-makers typically scrutinise (credibility, documents, finances, purpose, compliance and family ties). Below each dropdown, you will see the full detailed meaning of each option (Low/Medium/High/Not Applicable). If a question does not apply, select Not Applicable.
Check Your UK Visa Refusal Risk Based on Key Immigration Decision Factors
These factors affect credibility and the level of scrutiny.
No previous UK refusal or adverse immigration record.
Some history exists (e.g., refusal) but it can likely be addressed with a careful explanation and supporting evidence.
Previous refusal/cancellation/deception or serious adverse record — higher scrutiny and stronger legal explanation is usually required.
This question does not apply to your case.
All documents are consistent (names, dates, addresses, employment, purpose) and can be cross-verified without confusion.
Some minor mismatch or missing piece exists, but it can be clarified with an explanation and additional evidence.
Major contradictions or unreliable documents (or gaps you cannot explain) — one of the most common refusal drivers.
This question does not apply to your case.
You control your email/account and you fully understand what is being submitted in your name.
Someone is assisting you, but you control the account and have checked every form answer and uploaded document yourself.
Third party controls credentials/created email or you do not know what was submitted — credibility and compliance risk.
This question does not apply to your case.
Good travel history and timely return from previous trips (where relevant).
Limited travel history — may require stronger explanation and supporting evidence.
No travel history — not fatal, but can increase scrutiny depending on the application.
This question does not apply to your case.
UKVI often refuses where the financial story is unclear or unsupported.
Funds are stable and explainable; bank statements show a consistent financial pattern with a clear source of money.
Mostly clear but needs explanation (some unusual credits, timing issues, or gaps that can be addressed with supporting documents).
Recent large deposits/unclear source/inconsistent story — one of the highest refusal risk areas unless properly evidenced.
This question does not apply to your case.
Strong documentary proof exists (salary slips/tax returns/business proofs) and the amounts match the bank statements.
Some evidence exists, but it needs better structuring or has minor gaps that can be bridged with additional documents.
Weak evidence: funds are shown but the source cannot be credibly demonstrated with documents.
This question does not apply to your case.
A weak purpose or unclear intention can lead to refusal.
Purpose is clear with proper evidence (letters, itinerary, official documents) and a credible explanation.
Some evidence exists, but the explanation needs strengthening and better alignment with documents.
Purpose is vague/unclear and evidence is limited — UKVI may not be satisfied you are a genuine visitor/applicant.
This question does not apply to your case.
Strong proof of commitments/obligations (employment/business, family ties and responsibilities, studies, property, potential investment) compliance.
Some proof exists, but it can be strengthened through better documents or explanation.
Weak ties/commitments evidence — can increase refusal risk where UKVI must be satisfied on intention/compliance.
This question does not apply to your case.
Only answer if relevant; otherwise select Not Applicable.
Verified as genuine with consistent documents and direct verifiable contact (where applicable).
Some verification exists but there are uncertainties that should be clarified before submission.
Not verified/arranged via third party/doubts about genuineness — very high risk where sponsorship is central.
This question does not apply to your case.
Strong relationship evidence (history, communication, visits, photos, official records) where relevant.
Moderate evidence exists but needs better organisation and clear explanation.
Weak/inconsistent evidence — can result in credibility concerns and refusal where relationship / family ties is the key.
This question does not apply to your case.
Clear accommodation plan with evidence (address proof/host proof/affordability where relevant).
Some evidence exists but details need clarification.
Unclear plan/limited evidence — can raise doubts about credibility and practicality of the trip/stay.
This question does not apply to your case.
Clear, truthful explanation aligned with documents and Immigration Rules where relevant.
Basic explanation exists but should be strengthened and aligned with supporting evidence.
No explanation or unclear/contradictory story — can damage credibility and lead to refusal.
This question does not apply to your case.
UK Solicitor Document Review Advised
For all outcomes (Low/Medium/High), a document check by a UK-qualified Immigration Solicitor is advisable to confirm full compliance with the Immigration Rules, evidential requirements and credibility standards.
Request Solicitor ReviewDisclaimer: The content and results generated by this tool are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. No solicitor-client relationship is created through use of this tool. UKVI will assess each application on its individual facts, supporting documentation, and compliance with the Immigration Rules and relevant policy guidance. Independent legal advice should be obtained before taking any action based on this information.
UK Visa Document Checklist Tool
Generate a personalised, solicitor-led document checklist tailored to your specific UK visa category and circumstances.
Consultation fee is applicable.